Thread Index :: FAQ's :: Main Menu :: Posting Hints :: Emoticon Key :: Search
David's Lawspage :: EBU :: ACBL :: WBF
bridgetalk.com forums :: Laws & Rulings :: Svan Response To One Club - GCC

International Bridge Laws Forum

If you need help with the Laws or rulings from
any country in the world, this is the place!

Hosted by David Stevenson
Senior Consultant Director
English Bridge Union

To ask a question, click HERE and type in your message.
Please specify your country in your query where indicated.
Right click your mouse button for help on abbreviations.

Welcome, Register :: Log in 

View Thread Page(s): [ 1 ]

[ Get Email Advice of Replies ][ Print ][ Send ] [ Watch ] [ < ] [ Add a Reply ] [ > ]

pbleighton

103 posts
bridgetalk member

Reply
Svan Response To One Club - GCC ( 10:30:12 SunJun 15 2003 )

Country: USA

Svan is a Swedish ystem where 1C is either 11-13 balanced or 17+ any shape, and thus doesn't qualify for the 15+ hcp response exemption. The response structure to an opening of one club specifies that all hands with 8+ hcp and a 4 card major respond 1 of a major, even if, say, there a 4 spades and 7 clubs. You only respond 2 of a minor, 1NT, etc. without 4 in a major.

The GCC says that a response is natural if it show 4+ in a major. Does this mean a canape response is legal?

  
Ed

172 posts
Forum Host

Reply
Re: Svan Response To One Club - GCC ( 22:55:27 SunJun 15 2003 )

I'm not entirely certain, but I believe a canapé response is legal.

  
bluejak

426 posts
Forum Host

Reply
Re: Svan Response To One Club - GCC ( 01:22:50 MonJun 16 2003 )

I am convinced that your methods are GCC legal. For a start canape is not mentioned under 'Disallowed' so it should be allowed. Secondly some players have played canape openings without difficulty.

But the final reason to convince me is that if playing Walsh-type resonses a 1 or 1 response to 1 may conceal a much longer suit. These are certainly legal, so if they are permitted under GCC so are your responses.



---
David Stevenson <laws2@blakjak.com>
Liverpool, England, UK
http://blakjak.com/lws_menu.htm
 
 
Tim Goodwin

Reply
Re: Svan Response To One Club - GCC ( 04:11:53 SatAug 9 2003 )

Country: USA

While Svan 1M responses ot 1C are GCC, the 2H response showinf invitational or better with both minors is not GCC legal. Artificial responses (except 1D) must be game forcing.

Tim

  

View Thread Page(s): [ 1 ]

[ Get Email Advice of Replies ][ Print ][ Send ] [ Watch ] [ < ] [ Add a Reply ] [ > ]

6 bridge player(s) online in the last 15 minutes - 1 bridgetalk member(s), 0 incognito and 5 guest(s).
(The most ever was 52 09:45:43 Fri Feb 14 2003)
bluejak

 Total Members: 393, Newest Member: edm.

Register :: Log in

The time is now 00:25:24 Wed Aug 27 2003

Powered By BbBoard V1.4.2
© 2001-2003 BbBoy.net
Thread Index :: FAQ's :: Main Menu :: Posting Hints :: Emoticon Key :: Search
David's Lawspage :: EBU :: ACBL :: WBF

Legend :: Read Topic :: Unread Topic

Email Help | Full Format: ON :: OFF | Text: ON :: OFF | Email Status