Thread Index :: FAQ's :: Main Menu :: Posting Hints :: Emoticon Key :: Search
David's Lawspage :: EBU :: ACBL :: WBF
bridgetalk.com forums :: Laws & Rulings :: Penalty or Takeout

International Bridge Laws Forum

If you need help with the Laws or rulings from
any country in the world, this is the place!

Hosted by David Stevenson
Senior Consultant Director
English Bridge Union

To ask a question, click HERE and type in your message.
Please specify your country in your query where indicated.
Right click your mouse button for help on abbreviations.

Welcome, Register :: Log in 

View Thread Page(s): [ 1 ]

[ Get Email Advice of Replies ][ Print ][ Send ] [ Watch ] [ < ] [ Add a Reply ] [ > ]

Shuffler

Reply
Penalty or Takeout ( 17:33:20 MonJun 23 2003 )

Country: USA, ACBL

1NT - Double

Is the double of an opening 1NT (15-17 HCP)...

1. alertable if it is used strictly as a takeout double?
2. alertable if it is used as penalty regardless?

Thank you.
Shuffler

  
mycroft

67 posts
bridgetalk member

Reply
Re: Penalty or Takeout ( 18:01:12 MonJun 23 2003 )

Country: Canada

According to The ACBL Alert Pamphlet,
Quote:


Except for those doubles with highly unusual or unexpected meanings, doubles do not require an Alert.


I do wish they had provided more examples in common situations like this one (1NT-X).

A natural, penalty double, while uncommon opposite ACBL-style strong NTs, is hardly "highly unusual or unexpected." Definately not Alertable.

While an argument could be made that the double of 1NT is so frequently conventional that it is in nature "self-Alerting" (the idea behind the rule), it's probably just safer (especially if the doubler is one of the many ACBL players that ignore the "two complete and identical CCs *on the table, for the opponents' view*") to Alert any conventional double.

Most "takeout" doubles of NT openings are conventional, having more of a meaning than simply "bid something, partner", so I (and I'd) Alert them, be it "one-suited", "one-suited, good", "11+, spades and another, 4-4 or better", or whatever.

I have played against a pair that played double of 1NT as "4-suit takeout". I don't understand it - how could you possibly have a suitable hand? - and they really did take it out always (to their detriment at least 3 of the 4 times it came up during the match). I would say this is "highly unusual", and Alert it (maybe the opponents' brains will break on the explanation and they'll screw up the auction).

If you want an exact ruling, I'd email
The Source, or see if you can get an official response from the ACBL's Alert forum. However, in practice, no matter what the legalities, if you Alert any non-penalty-oriented double, and any double intended as penalty that has any distributional or max strength requirements, you'll win in the long run, because nobody will call the TD on you "failure to Alert".

Michael.

  

View Thread Page(s): [ 1 ]

[ Get Email Advice of Replies ][ Print ][ Send ] [ Watch ] [ < ] [ Add a Reply ] [ > ]

6 bridge player(s) online in the last 15 minutes - 1 bridgetalk member(s), 0 incognito and 5 guest(s).
(The most ever was 52 09:45:43 Fri Feb 14 2003)
bluejak

 Total Members: 393, Newest Member: edm.

Register :: Log in

The time is now 00:28:28 Wed Aug 27 2003

Powered By BbBoard V1.4.2
© 2001-2003 BbBoy.net
Thread Index :: FAQ's :: Main Menu :: Posting Hints :: Emoticon Key :: Search
David's Lawspage :: EBU :: ACBL :: WBF

Legend :: Read Topic :: Unread Topic

Email Help | Full Format: ON :: OFF | Text: ON :: OFF | Email Status