|
Thread Index :: FAQ's :: Main Menu :: Posting Hints :: Emoticon Key :: Search David's Lawspage :: EBU :: ACBL :: WBF |
International Bridge Laws ForumIf you need help with the Laws or rulings from |
| To ask a question, click HERE and type in your message. Please specify your country in your query where indicated. Right click your mouse button for help on abbreviations. |
| Welcome, Register :: Log in |
| View Thread Page(s): [ 1 ] |
| [ Get Email Advice of Replies ] | [ Print ] | [ Send ] | [ Watch ] | [ < ] [ Add a Reply ] [ > ] |
pbleighton  103 posts bridgetalk member  Reply |
Country: USA
When using a 2/1 response as a transfer not forcing to game, i.e. 1S-2C is a transfer to diamonds, my reading is that it is Midchart legal: "Any call that promises four or more cards in a known suit" but not GCC legal. If it were game forcing, it would be GCC legal. The only way a transfer which is not forcing to game is GCC legal is if it is a response to either: 1) a notrump of at least 10 hcp with a range of no more than 5 hcp; or 2) an artificial (1C or 1D) bid which promises at least 15+ hcp. Am I right (I hope I'm not)? |
|
Ed 172 posts Forum Host Reply |
Looks to me like you're right. Sorry about that.
 |
| View Thread Page(s): [ 1 ] |
| [ Get Email Advice of Replies ] | [ Print ] | [ Send ] | [ Watch ] | [ < ] [ Add a Reply ] [ > ] |
|
6 bridge player(s) online in the last 15 minutes - 1 bridgetalk member(s), 0 incognito and 5 guest(s). (The most ever was 52 09:45:43 Fri Feb 14 2003) bluejak |
|
Total Members: 393, Newest Member: edm. | Register :: Log in The time is now 00:31:47 Wed Aug 27 2003 |
© 2001-2003 BbBoy.net
|
Thread Index :: FAQ's :: Main Menu :: Posting Hints :: Emoticon Key :: Search David's Lawspage :: EBU :: ACBL :: WBF |
Legend :: 
Read Topic :: 
Unread Topic
Read Topic :: Unread Topic
Help | Full Format: ON :: OFF | Text: ON :: OFF | Email Status