Thread Index :: FAQ's :: Main Menu :: Posting Hints :: Emoticon Key :: Search
David's Lawspage :: EBU :: ACBL :: WBF
bridgetalk.com forums :: Laws & Rulings :: Transfers

International Bridge Laws Forum

If you need help with the Laws or rulings from
any country in the world, this is the place!

Hosted by David Stevenson
Senior Consultant Director
English Bridge Union

To ask a question, click HERE and type in your message.
Please specify your country in your query where indicated.
Right click your mouse button for help on abbreviations.

Welcome, Register :: Log in 

View Thread Page(s): [ 1 ]

[ Get Email Advice of Replies ][ Print ][ Send ] [ Watch ] [ < ] [ Add a Reply ] [ > ]

Val

17 posts
bridgetalk member

Reply
Transfers ( 13:01:03 ThuMar 20 2003 )

The bidding goes 1NT - Pass - 2-(Announced as transfer) - Pass - 2NT - Pass - ??? What can the 2 bidder legally do?

  
RMB

19 posts
bridgetalk member

Reply
Re: Transfers ( 13:19:00 ThuMar 20 2003 )

As far as I can see, the 2D bidder (the responder) is under no legal constraint and can make any call they like.

I guess the responder does not have an agreement about 2NT. It might be appropriate to alert 2NT and, if asked, say "our agreement is that partner would bid 2H, we have no agreement about 2NT in this sequence".


  
JimO

175 posts
Forum Host

Reply
Re: Transfers ( 14:23:05 ThuMar 20 2003 )

Country: USA

What did the 2D bidder intend 2D as?

If he intended it as a transfer, then the 1NT opener is superaccepting, showing a maximum 1NT with hearts.

If he intended it as a diamond signoff, then he must assume that opener is superaccepting, showing a maximum with diamonds.

If he intended it as forcing stayman, he must assme nothing other than opener has no 4-cad major of 5-card minor.

In any case, the 2D bidder must not base his bidding on opener's announcement.

Read the footnote to Law 75.



---
-Jim O'Neil
Oak Park, IL
 
 
Val

17 posts
bridgetalk member

Reply
Re: Transfers ( 20:50:32 ThuMar 20 2003 )

Thanks for your replies. responder meant 2 Diamonds as transfer and that is what partner announced.
The opener held:
K J x
K x
K J x x
A J x x x

Super accept is not part of their game.

Responder held:
x x x
Q x x x x
x x x
x x

Responder did not feel like bidding 3 - Was told that he could not and as I thought he could if he wanted to; so decided to ask.
[1 edits; Last edit by Val at 20:51:35 Thu Mar 20 2003]

  
bluejak

427 posts
Forum Host

Reply
Re: Transfers ( 23:04:51 ThuMar 20 2003 )

2 was announced as a transfer and was meant as a transfer. Therefore responder has no diffficulty: there is no problem from UI, for example.

Opener now rebids 2NT which is not part of their system. Since there is no UI, no other problem, responder can bid anything he likes. Why ever not? :rolleyes:



---
David Stevenson <laws2@blakjak.com>
Liverpool, England, UK
http://blakjak.com/lws_menu.htm
 
 

View Thread Page(s): [ 1 ]

[ Get Email Advice of Replies ][ Print ][ Send ] [ Watch ] [ < ] [ Add a Reply ] [ > ]

8 bridge player(s) online in the last 15 minutes - 1 bridgetalk member(s), 0 incognito and 7 guest(s).
(The most ever was 52 09:45:43 Fri Feb 14 2003)
bluejak

 Total Members: 393, Newest Member: edm.

Register :: Log in

The time is now 00:34:52 Wed Aug 27 2003

Powered By BbBoard V1.4.2
© 2001-2003 BbBoy.net
Thread Index :: FAQ's :: Main Menu :: Posting Hints :: Emoticon Key :: Search
David's Lawspage :: EBU :: ACBL :: WBF

Legend :: Read Topic :: Unread Topic

Email Help | Full Format: ON :: OFF | Text: ON :: OFF | Email Status