Thread Index :: FAQ's :: Main Menu :: Posting Hints :: Emoticon Key :: Search
David's Lawspage :: EBU :: ACBL :: WBF
bridgetalk.com forums :: Laws & Rulings :: misexplanation

International Bridge Laws Forum

If you need help with the Laws or rulings from
any country in the world, this is the place!

Hosted by David Stevenson
Senior Consultant Director
English Bridge Union

To ask a question, click HERE and type in your message.
Please specify your country in your query where indicated.
Right click your mouse button for help on abbreviations.

Welcome, Register :: Log in 

View Thread Page(s): [ 1 ]

[ Get Email Advice of Replies ][ Print ][ Send ] [ Watch ] [ < ] [ Add a Reply ] [ > ]

[]

Reply
misexplanation ( 06:25:06 SatJul 27 2002 )

North opens 1S, East overcalls 2S, alerted wy West as Clubs and Diamonds, South pass, West 3D, N doubles
East has ----
ARD10xx
x
ADVxxx
Whats is he allowed to say, knowing that the CC mentions Michaels ( 2S shows H and C )
What if there were no CC available ?
Many thanks

  
JimO

175 posts
Forum Host

Reply
Re: misexplanation ( 13:43:14 SatJul 27 2002 )

There are 2 issues here - Unauthorized information and Misinfomation. (See Laws 16 and 75).
East is allowed to bid his hand, but must ignore West's misexplanation. He must assume that West took his 2S bid to mean H+minor. West's explanation is UI for East.
After the auction is over, if E-W become the declaring side, or after the play is over, if E-W become defenders, they must inform the opponents that the 2S bid was explained incorrectly. N-S may be intitled to redress if they were damaged by the incorrect explanation.
If there is no convention card (a procedural violation), the situation is the same, as we are to assume a mistaken explanation, rather than a mistaken bid, in absence of evidence to the contrary.

In this case, E should be allowed to bid his hand - 4H seems about right - bending over backwards to not use the UI from partner's misexplanation.

-Jim O'Neil

  
bluejak

428 posts
Forum Host

Reply
Re: misexplanation ( 22:10:15 SunJul 28 2002 )

It is only a procedural violation not to have a CC if it is played in a jurisdiction that requires one - not all do.

Otherwise, I agree with what Jim says.



---
David Stevenson <laws2@blakjak.com>
Liverpool, England, UK
http://blakjak.com/lws_menu.htm
 
 

View Thread Page(s): [ 1 ]

[ Get Email Advice of Replies ][ Print ][ Send ] [ Watch ] [ < ] [ Add a Reply ] [ > ]

5 bridge player(s) online in the last 15 minutes - 1 bridgetalk member(s), 0 incognito and 4 guest(s).
(The most ever was 52 09:45:43 Fri Feb 14 2003)
bluejak

 Total Members: 393, Newest Member: edm.

Register :: Log in

The time is now 00:48:52 Wed Aug 27 2003

Powered By BbBoard V1.4.2
© 2001-2003 BbBoy.net
Thread Index :: FAQ's :: Main Menu :: Posting Hints :: Emoticon Key :: Search
David's Lawspage :: EBU :: ACBL :: WBF

Legend :: Read Topic :: Unread Topic

Email Help | Full Format: ON :: OFF | Text: ON :: OFF | Email Status