Thread Index :: FAQ's :: Main Menu :: Posting Hints :: Emoticon Key :: Search
David's Lawspage :: EBU :: ACBL :: WBF
bridgetalk.com forums :: Laws & Rulings :: Preventing an irregularity

International Bridge Laws Forum

If you need help with the Laws or rulings from
any country in the world, this is the place!

Hosted by David Stevenson
Senior Consultant Director
English Bridge Union

To ask a question, click HERE and type in your message.
Please specify your country in your query where indicated.
Right click your mouse button for help on abbreviations.

Welcome, Register :: Log in 

View Thread Page(s): [ 1 ]

[ Get Email Advice of Replies ][ Print ][ Send ] [ Watch ] [ < ] [ Add a Reply ] [ > ]

[James Vickers]

Reply
Preventing an irregularity ( 11:05:39 FriJul 26 2002 )

It is a basic tenet that the laws define correct procedure, and that anything not specifically sanctioned in the laws is not allowed. Thus:

Dummy may point out to his partner who is detaching a card to play that the lead is in dummy (or that a defender has the lead), as this is sanctioned in Law 41.

Dummy may not point out that a defender who is detaching a card is not on lead, as this is not specifically sanctioned.

So far agreed?

Last night my partner pulled out a card to lead to a trick, not having noticed that declarer had won the last trick. I stopped him in time, but an opponent objected that I was not allowed to do so.

Which law or regulation (or inference from either of these) allows me to do this?

  
bluejak

428 posts
Forum Host

Reply
Re: Preventing an irregularity ( 14:48:53 FriJul 26 2002 )

None. I think it is illegal.

I know everyone does stop their partner form doing things wrong when defencding, and people rarely comment, but I actually think it is illegal. As you say, there is no Law allowing it, so ...... :smile:

Let's see whether Ed comes up with something I have missed.




---
David Stevenson <laws2@blakjak.com>
Liverpool, England, UK
http://blakjak.com/lws_menu.htm
 
 
Ed

172 posts
Forum Host

Reply
Re: Preventing an irregularity ( 03:27:39 SunJul 28 2002 )

Don't think so. Law 9A2(b)2 and Law 46B2 specifically allowed dummy to attempt to prevent declarer's irregularity. I can't find any similar law allowing a defender to attempt to prevent his partner's.

  

View Thread Page(s): [ 1 ]

[ Get Email Advice of Replies ][ Print ][ Send ] [ Watch ] [ < ] [ Add a Reply ] [ > ]

5 bridge player(s) online in the last 15 minutes - 1 bridgetalk member(s), 0 incognito and 4 guest(s).
(The most ever was 52 09:45:43 Fri Feb 14 2003)
bluejak

 Total Members: 393, Newest Member: edm.

Register :: Log in

The time is now 00:48:57 Wed Aug 27 2003

Powered By BbBoard V1.4.2
© 2001-2003 BbBoy.net
Thread Index :: FAQ's :: Main Menu :: Posting Hints :: Emoticon Key :: Search
David's Lawspage :: EBU :: ACBL :: WBF

Legend :: Read Topic :: Unread Topic

Email Help | Full Format: ON :: OFF | Text: ON :: OFF | Email Status