This was Jon Siegel's reply:
I think you and the other club members should imagine someone coming to you with the following complaint: "One of the players in our regular poker group is disturbing the other players by bluffing. All our other players can always be counted on to have the hands that their bets indicate, but this one player bluffs several times a session -- sometimes getting good results, sometimes not -- and it's really disturbing the others. What can we do?"
What would you say to the person who made this complaint? Probably you would say: "Bluffing is a part of the game of poker. Every poker player has the right to bluff, and without any bluffs the game would be less interesting and less fun. You can always choose not to play with this difficult member of your group, but your criticism of the practice of bluffing is not well-founded. The best resolution would be for the other members of the group to become more skilled at detecting and counteracting bluffs."
The same answer, I believe, applies to bridge. Psyches are part of bridge and the other players in your club should become more skilled at detecting and counteracting them. I know that's not the answer you wanted but I'm afraid my sympathies are with the psycher.
Editor's note:
Last article |
Laws menu |
Main index |
Top of article |
Local menu |
Next article |